Hand bill for internet protest of 04-12-04
“It is a scary time in America, boys and
girls.” ---- Don Imus, 04-12-04
Was Don Imus thinking about the war on terror in
which we are losing a dozen young men every few days? No. Was Don thinking about the threat hanging over our Nation from new terrorist attacks? No. Was he then
thinking of the threat of bio warfare, and the destruction of all mankind? No.
Don was talking about the fines his colleague Howard
Stern has received. That the millionaire Howard Stern, or rather the billion
dollar media enterprises he represents, will have to pay a fine for indecency, this, is what Don Imus finds “scary.”
Sometimes the morally obtuse can be humorous; but
they can also be disgusting; even criminal.
Don Imus has used his influence with the criminal organization, GAB Robins, (see Psy Ops), to harasse me; he has stalked me for these twelve years since I wrote the ‘Last Letter,’ (see Moynihan Library
at this web site), and today he is complaining about the conduct of the F. C. C.?
They fined a fellow millionaire for indecency, and that is what, in Don Imus’ mind, is scary.
How can he be this blind to his own hypocrisy? How can he complain about anyone? But
the F. C. C.? How has he so compartmentalized his mind? There is something missing inside of him. Conscience.
He is aware that he has been exposed. For example on Friday, 04-09-04, he lets
it be known that Mr. Jim Lehrer, (see Who Killed Duane Garrett Part II: The After
Action Report) has written him “a letter,” and also that he has been contacted by the New York Times who had a
news reporter call him.(?) He also started to say something about Gibson’s
movie then checked himself. (see the prior hand bill 04-08-04)
He knows that his treachery, his oppression, his
little “amusements,” have been exposed. But then, so what if everyone knows that he is a scoundrel? No, there is not even that much self awareness. He doesn’t
like millionaires being fined by the F. C. C.. His own criminal conduct doesn’t
even come up to the surface of his consciousness.
A hollow man. An empty shell of a human being. A man without God.
“I spoke just now of a move from morality
on into religion. I could think rather in terms of a move from religion into
morality, that is rediscovery of religious modes of thought deep inside morals. That
religion and morals somehow overlap or ‘blend’ may seem obvious: yet in the secular atmosphere of today may need
stating as well as studying. The exercise of duty is not a cold look at the facts
and a jump to a moral intuition or dictate of reason: the picture implied by
a sharp distinction between fact and value. We are all the time building up our
value world and exercising, or failing to exercise, our sense of truth in the daily hourly minutely business of apprehending,
or failing to apprehend, what is real and distinguishing it from illusion. The
absolute’ may be thought of as a distant moral goal, like a temple at the end of a pilgrimage, a condition of perfection
glimpsed but never reached. Or of course it may be thought of as being, or being
the property of, a personal God. But
the idea of absolute, at truth and certainty, is contained in ordinary exercises of cognition, it is already inherent in the
knowledge which suggest our duty, it is in our sense of truth; however feeble or ‘specialised’ our response to
it may be. Our justifications of our moral failures pay it homage. It should not be seen as a dangerous possibly heteronomous property of religion (or a kind of transcendent
‘thing’), but as something innate in morality which can also bind or connect
morality with a certain understanding of religion.” --- Iris Murdoch, (303)“Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals.”
Don Imus’ failure to apprehend his hypocrisy
is also his failure to apprehend God.
God is “in” your morals. Your knowledge
of what Don Imus, and Michael Weiner, and Ron Owens, and all the others have
done to me, is your “building up our value world” and your failure to act on that knowledge is your “exercising,
or failing to exercise,” your “sense of truth.” For example
consider when Bill O’Reilly, just before a commercial break, said that he did not shout down callers the way “some
talk show hosts do.” Then apparently he thought that Michael Weiner, (who
is notorious for shouting down his callers), might take offense. (Why would Bill
When Bill O’Reilly came back on the
air he made an explicit statement saying that he was not referring, (in his earlier statement about shouting down callers), to Michael Weiner and then went on to praise Weiner for being “efficient”
in “stripping down phonies.” O’Reilly knew about Weiner, but
for reasons of his own, chose to endorse Weiner with his own personal endorsement.
Weiner would later travel to meet with “Mel”
for a “private screening” of the “Passion.” Quid pro quo? This
Bill O’Reilly choice, is an example of
“failing to exercise, our sense of truth.” It is here in Bill O’Reilly’s “ordinary exercises
of cognition,” where you will find God. Not a celluloid Christ.
This is what is meant by the phrase: God has become man.
Not a God in the heavens, not a Thunder God,
but a God right here, right now, not just ‘with us’ but ‘in us,’ in the very wave length of light
that reaches your eyes and the neuron networks that stream and glow inside your cranium,
“in the daily hourly minutely business of apprehending, or failing to apprehend, what is real and distinguishing
it from illusion,” this is where you will find God: in the ‘ordinary
exercise of cognition.’
In the glassy eyed Jim Lehrer, in the obtuse Don
Imus, in Bill O’Reilly’s choices, cognition has failed. In their
failure to apprehend value, they have failed to apprehend God. Without value
there can be no God. And that, Don Imus, truly is scary.
Colonial Motel Suspect
On the Media,
that was. . . cute. (Someday you might try actual reporting.)
Hand bill for internet protest of 04-10-04
Darkness within Darkness, the Gate of all
| a "ranch for kids with cancer."
Imus was so pleased today, Thursday, 04-08-04, to announce
that Senator Flip Flop has agreed to come back on his air. His old radio pals
have not abandoned him!
That his oppression of this web site’s author has been exposed makes no difference. (see Psy Ops and Who Killed Duane Garrett Part II)
What is the point of being rich and powerful if you can not use your wealth and power to destroy others? Senator John Flip Flop Kerry, a rich man himself, understands this.
He called his Secret Service minder a “son of a bitch” because he, like
Mrs. Billy Clinton, regards the Secret Service as he does any of his domestics. We do not even live in the same country. They are not like you or I; theirs is
the psychology of the rich and powerful. A mixture of vanity and ego mixed with
a self righteousness that is more than just entitlement.
But how do they sustain this self righteousness?
Where does it come from? This is the function of the “ranch for
kids with cancer.” It is both a pedestal and a shield for the ego of Imus,
the vanity of Imus. Don Imus stalked me for a dozen years. Followed me from my job at State Farm to GAB Robins in order to harasse me and destroy me for, as he says,
his “amusement.” It “amuses” him. If this oppression should become known, or even if he should have an uneasy bout of conscience, there is
always the “ranch for kids with cancer,” a ‘good work,’
a balm for a troubled conscience.
And here you have also the liberal’s psychology.
Have you flipped flopped on the war? No problem, just think: “kids with cancer.” Have you gone
on the air and accused your children, (from the first marriage), of being the cause of family quarrels? Think: “Kids with cancer.” Wasted twenty years on booze and drugs: “kids with cancer.”
In another age they would have made donations to the Church, to buy off their conscience. (Usually only on their death beds.) Today,
they use other peoples money to buy off their conscience. Tax leveraged charity
is so much more economical. And as Kerry knows it is even better to use the taxpayer’s
money. All that ‘good work,’ soothes the guilty conscience and deflects
all criticism. A useful shield for the politician.
Has Senator Kennedy told the widows of the dead, their friends and family that their
Commander in Chief led them to war on a lie? This is not a problem for Senator
(Notice that Kennedy specified the place where he alleges the lie was concocted. “Texas.” Why did the state
where the lie was made up have relevance? Why did Senator Kennedy think it important
to specify Texas? A pedestal and a shield for his ego? He wants to add, ‘My brother was murdered in Texas.’
The assassination of his brother is Senator Kennedy’s “ranch
for kids with cancer.” Texas, did you hear that? Where they killed my brother! Don’t you dare criticize
For others, their “ranch for kids with cancer” is racial discrimination
and Jim Crow Laws, or the subordination of women, or the Holocaust. (Michael
Weiner thinks he can do no wrong, because of what those Gentiles did to “my people.” ) For Senator Kennedy it is “Down in Texas.” Did
you get that, Texas. A touch stone. A
shield against all criticism or even, one suspects, self examination. And also
a pedestal onto which to mount ones suffering to the exaltation of the adoring and sympathetic public. I suppose ones military service could become ones “ranch for kids with cancer.” Self righteousness and ego might cause one to equate “draft dodgers in Canada” with those who
serve in the National Guard. One might do that if ones ego and self righteousness
got the better of ones judgment. Do you agree Senator Kerry? Or have you already flipped flopped out of that?)
Senator John Flip Flop Kerry knows what Imus has done.
Knows about the oppression of this author, the burglary, Senator Dodd’s involvement, about all the rest as well. He just does not care. Or rather, he thinks that his ‘good works,’ what ever they may be when he is president, will
offset the wrongs he must do on the way. The widows that Kennedy has lied to,
have been lied to for a good cause: the election of Flip Flop.
When John McLaughlin tossed Mylroie’s book aside calling it “junk”
he wasn’t really talking about Mylroie. (see Who Killed Duane Garrett Part
II) He was talking about this web site’s author. Why ‘junk?’ Because I do not belong to the same
social set as McLaughlin and his charming wife. He was saying that I was junk.
The viewers might have thought he was making a serious point about war, and life. A young widow in the audience watching, (yes, Imus), watching in their, (now her),
trailer, watching and trying to understand: ‘why? Why did this happen?’
She might have thought McLaughlin was really talking about Mylroie’s book.
But then she is a low life, white trash, . . . help me out Imus, what? Red
neck. What else would you say?
This is why Imus spoke approvingly of McLaughlin.
A wink from one rich man of power to another. Does McLaughlin have a “ranch
for kids with cancer” or its equivalent? Perhaps he doesn’t need
it. Perhaps his conscience is under control.
After all he hasn’t bitten any flight attendants . . . recently.
I suspect that his wealth and power alone are enough to sustain his ego and self righteousness.
Senator Flip Flop Kerry should go on Imus’ show.
Flip Flop you are in your element. You are a man of your times. And they will all be watching: Christopher Matthews, Jim Lehrer,
Rosie Allen, the Swansons, Ron Owens, Michael Weiner, all of them empty shells
of people, without scruple, . . . dust. Corruption within corruption.
I could not understand why Bill O’Reilly
would do an on air promotion for Michael Weiner after this web site had published several articles about what he has
been doing all of these years, (see How Don and Mike Removed the Evil One and Intel.
Operations), including one that O’Reilly’s coworker, Sean Hannity, had commented on. (see 45 Minutes and the Distortion of History) If Hannity
knew then it is a safe bet that O’Reilly also knew. Indeed O’Reilly
made several references to 45 Minutes on his own show. He didn’t
have to do a promo for the guy. Did Weiner’s favorable review of the Gibson
film have anything to do with it? Bill, I thought you were looking out for me?
And the film? The crucifixion of
Jesus Christ. Another ultimate self justification? A touch stone? A shield for the ego? Oh, yes. Another “ranch for kids with cancer.”
Vanity sanctified. Corruption within corruption.
Yes, of course, Senator Flip Flop, will be on Imus’ air. Of course.
--------The Colonial Motel Suspect
|You wouldn't know a bioweapons program. . .
|. . . if you stumbled over it.
Handbill for internet
protest of: 04-07-04
John Flip Flop Kerry a “national leader?” I think not.
Would a national
leader condone burglaries? 12 years of harassment of the poor by the rich? The corruption of our national life? Moral
leadership is a requirement for the job you seek Mr. Flip Flop.
But then Kerry has never been a leader. He has been a committeeman. Just another
member of the committee of a hundred: The Senate.
A Senate that represents more acres of corn than citizens of Californian. A Senate that represents more head of cattle than citizens on New York. Marin County has two Senators; Montana, Wyoming, all well represented. But where are our United States
Senators? Who will represents our Nation?
Senator Flip Flop Kerry will no more take responsibility
for his party’s leadership than he has for anything else during his life in the Senate.
The Senate allowed itself to be attacked a second time by a bio-weapon, in exactly the same way it had been attacked
the first time. The Senate has shown itself incompetent to protect even
itself, A SECOND TIME!
Does Senator Flip Flop accept responsibility? Why no. He is just one of a hundred.
(Which is why our Army is commanded by the Executive, not by a committee.) If Senator Kennedy uses the word “fraud,” Senator
Flip Flop has no responsibility to respond. Being a Senator means never having
to take responsibility.
for internet protest of: 04-06-04
No Senator Flip Flop on Imus on Friday, 04-02-04.
No Senator Flip Flop on Imus on Monday, 04-05-04.
No Senator Flip Flop on Imus on Tuesday, 04-06-04.
No Senator Flip Flop on Imus on Wednesday, 04-07-04.
Did Senator John Flip Flop Kerry flip flop on his pal?
Perhaps Senator Flip Flop does not agree with Imus harassing
me at State Farm in 1998, or Imus following me to GAB Robins in 2003 and using his influence with the owners to harass me
there. (see PSY OPS)
Is that it Senator Flip Flop? Are you too good for the likes of Don Imus? Now that you want to be
a "national leader" and he has been exposed for the degenerate that he is ? (see
Who Killed Duane Garrett Part II )
But then does Senator Flip Flop disassociate himself from
Senator Kennedy’s remarks?
If Flip Flop disassociates himself from Imus, shouldn’t
the Senator also disassociate himself from Senator Kennedy’s remarks? Or does
Flip Flop agree with Kennedy? And if with Kennedy why not Imus?
Senator Flip Flop, did you ever finally have to decide? Pick one and let the other one slide?
(And, what got Senator Kennedy started on this Vi-et-nam
thing? ) (see The Army Navy Club )
Handbill for internet protest of: 04-04-04
Mat Drudge, . . . .did you see that? John
Flip Flop Kerry flip flopped on Don Imus on 4-2-04. They booked on the show,
then at the last minute canceled claiming that the 45 minute outpatient procedure on his shoulder the day before prevented
his appearance. Do you believe that, or this:
I publish Who Killed Duane Garrett Part II on 4-1-04 and John Flip Flop Kerry flip flopped 24 hours later. What do you think? It is like we are playing cat and mouse
on the internet. Will Flip Flop come
out of his hole on Monday? Perhaps he can come on Imus with his friend Senator
Dodd. Flip flop, the whole world is watching. Glenn Beck did you see that?
What has he got to do with this?
Oh, nothing, he just doesn’t like being left
out of things. The whole world is watching.
The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching.
Suggestion Number One: The F.B.I. should visit the San Rafael Police and find out what they know about the burglary of the
Suggestion Number Two: Then the Sergeant of Arms of the United States Senate should be contacted and asked to investigate which
Senators received the stolen notebook.
The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. The whole world is watching. . . .